Tag Archives | Plant Classification

Merits and Demerits of Thorne’s System

In this article we will discuss about the merits and demerits of Throne’s system. Merits of Thorne's System: 1. The woody Annonales which are now universally accepted as the most primitive living Angiosperms are the starting point of his system and constitute the base of the phylogenetic shrub of Angiosperms. The Berberidaceae and the Nymphaeales, though more advanced than the [...]

By |2016-08-30T17:16:31+00:00August 30, 2016|Plant Classification|Comments Off on Merits and Demerits of Thorne’s System

Bentham and Hooker System: Merits and Demerits

In this article we will discuss about the merits and demerits of Bentham and Hooker's system. Merits of Bentham and Hooker's System: 1. The description of families and genera is very accurate. 2. The system is very handy for identification purposes. 3. The system is of great practical convenience. The British and Commonwealth herbaria therefore still adopt this system in [...]

By |2016-08-30T17:16:31+00:00August 30, 2016|Plant Classification|Comments Off on Bentham and Hooker System: Merits and Demerits

Comparison among Different Systems of Plant Classification

Learn about the comparison among Bentham and Hooker, Engler and Prantl, and Hutchinson systems of plant classification.  Comparison # Bentham and Hooker: 1. It is a natural system and mostly used for practical purposes. 2. It is based on A.P de Candolle's system (1818). 3. Classification is based on single and mostly artificial characters; so closely allied families are separated [...]

By |2016-08-30T17:16:28+00:00August 30, 2016|Plant Classification|Comments Off on Comparison among Different Systems of Plant Classification
Go to Top